ACHIEVEMENTS OF TSUNAMI SURVIVORS


Four years after the Boxing day tsunami, British survivors should remind themselves what they have achieved in trying to come to terms with the changes in their lives (and all their lives have been permanently changed), how they have contributed in helping, directly or indirectly, the survivors in the affected countries and how they have helped to reduce many of the hurdles for those British citizens who will be caught up in future disasters.   They should also remind themselves of the need to continue to push for solutions to the problems that remain.

Immediately after the tsunami it was apparent that the FCO (Foreign Office) was inadequately prepared to handle such a disaster.   Most of the staff  were on holiday and the initial feedback from embassies badly underestimated the potential losses and injuries to British citizens.   The initial response team was sent to Sri Lanka, whereas there were far more British people present in the coastal areas of Thailand.    These were not all visiting holiday makers; many casualties were among businessmen and their families and aid workers living in the affected countries and taking a Christmas break.   British casualties were amongst the last foreign visitors to be contacted in hospitals, and the attitude of the embassy shocked many survivors.   The emergency response lines in the U.K. were totally inadequate and the operators insufficiently prepared.  

Everyone has their own story, but it was soon realised that changes had to be made to the way tragedies such as the Boxing Day Tsunami were handled.   Many survivors (this term includes those who physically survived the waves, those who were closely involved and those who lost family and friends) individually and as groups put pressure on the Government through the media, their Members of Parliament and directly to the FCO to try to make the necessary changes to ensure that such failures would not be repeated.  Some of these changes were already in place when the 7/7 bombings took place 6 months later.

For the first time a N.A.O. (National Audit Office) report was issued based entirely on survivors’ observations about the failures of agencies and the improvements that needed to be made.   Survivors were interviewed; video recordings made and detailed questionnaires completed.   Videos were also made by other agencies to help train disaster response staff and survivors gave talks to various agencies including the FCO.  The personal experiences of survivors make a far bigger impact than impersonal presentations.   

Amongst the many changes that have taken place:

•    Two further emergency response teams have been organised in different time zones on a 24/7 basis.   No doubt this helped for the Mumbai attacks.

•    The HAU (Humanitarian Assistance Unit) has been established to co-ordinate responses to future disasters.   This unit is part of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS).   The minister responsible is the Rt. Hon. Tessa Jowell.   The unit now works together with the FCO and co-ordinates other agencies.

•    FCO staff receives training in how to respond to disaster survivors.   Embassies, High Commissions and Consulates regularly test their emergency plans.  

•    The law requiring relatives to wait 7 years before a death certificate is issued, if identification is not possible, was relaxed for the first time.

•    Training for Police Family Liaison Officers has been improved.   Leaflets have been prepared to distribute to survivors to aid the liaison process and to reflect the fact that people in stress only take in 20% of what they are told. These changes need to be continued and improvements monitored. 


Changes that need to be addressed/competed:

•    The FCO offered to finance psychological help to survivors for a period of one year.   This was no doubt well intended, but implied that after a year the problems should be resolved.   In fact PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder) often appears years after a trauma.   There was no register of experts for the treatment of post trauma problems and there is a lack of doctors trained in diagnosis.  Availability of psychological help was often dependant on where survivors lived and who they spoke to. Not everyone was aware of the help available.  Recent disasters and the Afghan and Iraq wars will increase demand for psychological help and these matters have not yet been fully addressed.  

•    Over zealous interpretation of Data Protection legislation obstructed the sharing of data between agencies.   Efforts are being made to improve this by The Justice Secretary Jack Straw, who is well aware of the issues faced by tsunami survivors, and the amended act is under discussion in Parliament.    The problem is to achieve responsible and beneficial data-sharing while avoiding abuse (unfortunately prevalent) by Government, Local Authorities and Private Enterprise.   The proposed act is in its current form is being opposed by the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats.   

•    Difficulties were encountered in reporting missing family members.    Improvements have been made to both the FCO and Police call centres but may still not be adequate for a large emergency.   The request for on-line filing of missing person’s details to Interpol standards has to our knowledge not yet been finalised.  

•    The tsunami prompted an unprecedented level of donations.   Most of the funds no doubt benefited the affected countries.   Some never left the U.K., or disappeared into the hands of unscrupulous officials in the destination countries, or in excessive administration costs.   Many NGOs did not consult the local populations and provided unsuitable housing.   Most survivors contributed in some way or another, many creating their own charities and sometimes raising 6 figure amounts.   They made sure that the money went straight to the people in need, often returning to the countries themselves to participate in teaching or rebuilding projects.  Better co-ordination is required for future disasters, a very complex subject.

•    It is ironic that there are many British citizens who are in financial difficulties as a result of the tsunami, having been orphaned, permanently disabled, or infected with tropical disorders acquired during hospital treatment.   No official funding was provided for them, largely because the DEC (The Disasters Emergency Committee) which co-ordinated the 12 leading aid agencies, completely forgot about them.   Imagine the response if 151 people had been killed and around 850 injured in a disaster in the U.K.   Those who applied for help to the Red Cross Tsunami Hardship Fund (established in November 2005) were met with daunting forms and intrusive means testing at a time when they were unable to cope.   This still needs to be addressed.
The majority of our members feel strongly that a memorial should be established to commemorate the tsunami.   They were given a choice of three sites, including Victoria Tower Gardens next to the Houses of Parliament; however 61% voted for the Natural History Museum as their first choice.   Before the 2004 tsunami most people did not know the meaning of the word tsunami, it is Japanese meaning "harbour wave" and refers to a large wave that strikes places like harbors.  After Alan Greenspan, ex president of the US Federal Reserve, in October 2008 referred to the current problems as going through a once in a century "credit tsunami", future generations may be forgiven for thinking that a tsunami is a recession caused by out of control traders and lenders allowed to run wild by a lax administration.  
We feel that it is essential to educate the young about the true meaning of a tsunami, how the 2004 tsunami affected the world, and why it is important in an era of global warming and rising oceans to protect natural shore lines.   Of particular importance are mangrove swamps and marshes which slow down tsunamis.   The Natural History Museum is the ideal place for this, and the proposed memorial could, at a later date, be linked to a display in the museum.    In an age when such major events are forgotten by the majority so quickly we do need to remind generations that tsunamis are not just strange occurrences which happen infrequently on the other side of the world. We need to raise awareness of the fact that geologists have indicated that tsunamis could occur in the future nearer home in the Atlantic, which would possibly endanger Europe, Africa and America.
Many visitors from around the world will have connections to the Boxing Day Tsunami and may well have suffered loss or trauma in one of the seventeen countries affected.  They may have had relatives amongst the probable 300,000 dead.  No one will ever know the full toll. No one should ever forget this natural tragedy.


Posted by Robert Brewster 27 Jan 2009

About Tsunami Support UK 

The Tsunami Support Network, coordinated by the British Red Cross, has now passed on its activities to an elected committee aimed at continuing to help provide support for families and individuals in the UK affected by the catastrophic South East Asian Earthquake and the resulting Tsunami of December 26th 2004
Membership is restricted to those directly affected by the tsunami and their close friends and relations.

Our objectives are:

• To provide a point of contact in the UK to offer support and information to people affected by the tsunami and through which people can contact each other to provide mutual support

• To seek to raise awareness of the needs of those directly affected by the tsunami

• To plan for tsunami anniversaries and commemorative events

• to relieve the needs of UK citizens and residents affected by the tsunami by providing support, practical advice, and help in obtaining financial assistance

• to cooperate with any statutory authority in the provision and/or management of a memorial to the tsunami victims and of any tsunami commemorative event in the furtherance of the above objects.






Web Design by Giant Systems Leeds